Showing posts with label group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label group. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Page break and on last record problem

Hello,

In crystal these are available-

1- Conditional Page break 'OnLastRecord'- I have few groups and if I put page break it breaks on each group even if that group has 2 rows but I want a break at the end of the page. So is there conditional page break in SSRS 2005.

2- I am also having problem with controlling Number of lines in a page, few pages are very long as compared to others, though when export to pdf it gives according to the page size set, but not while viewing, is there any work around to this in SSRS 2005.

I will appreciate any suggestion or comment.

regards

1 - this might help you get started http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1682115&SiteID=1 -- if not, what have you tried so far?

2 - when you say "few pages are very long as compared to others" you have to specify: what output format are you talking about? PDF uses printable page size, HTML uses interactive page size, Excel is different because it's allowed to have as many rows as are within an explicit page break set by your code.

I have tried to define "explicit" and "implicit" page breaks separately; see the grey shaded note close to the beginning of this post: http://spacefold.com/lisa/post/Reset-On-Group-(Page-X-of-XX-in-a-group%2c-within-a-total-Y-of-YY-for-the-report)%2c-SQL-Reporting-Services-Style-.aspx. You will also find something similar referenced in the thread to which I linked above.

The difference between behavior of "implicit" page breaks for different formats isn't a bug requiring a "workaround"; it's a feature <s>. Different formats do have different requirements and that's a fact of output life.

So if you want page breaks based on some condition which is external to formatting requirements for a given output format, IOW consistent across output formats, you need to define what that condition is explicitly.

>L<

|||

Thanks for the reply.

I think I am still having problem.

Here is what I am doing-

I have three groups - 1-Customer, 2-Department,3-Priority and the details.

1- need to break if customer = Inactive

2- need to break if Department = Closed

3- need to break Priority = normal

So I made first group - Group1(Customer) then inside that I made another groupd Group1A(for customer) without any header and footer and changed the Group expresseion with a boolean parameter 'PageBreak' as is mentioned in the article and similarly did the for other groups but still no luck and it is breaking with the Group. Please let me know if I am following this correctly.

I am hiding the boolean parameter as I don't want to prompt it.

thanks

|||

I think you are mixing up a couple of things. The idea of using a parameter had nothing to do with data-based conditional page breaks <s>.

That example I pointed you to had a condition that came in from the outside, so it was a parameter. Your condition has to do with your data, and I didn't mean you to emulate the parameter part . I'm sorry about this...

I wanted you to see the idea of the nested groups in which one group handles your real group break and the other one is responsible for the conditional page break, by grouping on what may be a completely unrelated expression. OK?

I don't have your exact data set but I have created an example with a completely arbitrary page break that is caused by a data condition, instead of the external (parameterized) condition in the other example I pointed to. I will tell you what I did and maybe this will be a better example for you. It isn't going to be *exactly* what you need. But it should show you what you have to do, depending on the effect you're after.

1. I have a table of orders for customers with locale data. I did a query out of this data that looks like this:

Code Snippet


SELECT Customer, Locale FROM OrderHeader ORDER BY Customer

2. In this dataset, let's say I wanted to group by the customer's last name. I only want page breaks if the Locale starts with "N". (I told you it was totally arbitrary! )

3. I set a group on a "normal" group break expression -- in this case

Code Snippet


=Fields!Customer.Value

I set this group to repeat headers since that happened to be where the headers were.

4. I create an outer group on the following, non-normal expression:

Code Snippet


=IIF(LEFT(Fields!Locale.Value,1) ="N",
Fields!Customer.Value,
False)

... and this is the group that has the page break.

Does this help you understand better? The point is, the outer group is going to force a page break when you provide the group break expression with the value that is actually changing, which I've done in the first argument to IIF() here. In the second argument, the value False isn't changing, and the outer group doesn't break.

>L<

|||

Thanks a lot, I thing I got it.

Is there anything like 'OnLastRecord' in SSRS.

and is there a way to get a certain number of rows in a page.

thanks

Page Break after sub report - Not by design

All,

I have a report for a Quote print that has 1 table with 1 group in it by Quote #. The detail level is showing the line items on the quote and a second detail line for a sub report to show any notes. If the quote has 1 line on it, I am always getting a page break after the sub report even if it doesn't display anything.

The report shows the following:

Note each of these will contain a rectangle that the text boxes are displayed in unless it is a sub-report then no rectange.

    Group header 1 - Address information

    Group header 1 - contains a sub report for some notes

    Group header 1 - Opening paragraph

    Group header 1 - Blank line

    Group header 1 - contains the line headings

    Detail - contains the line details

    Detail - contains the sub report for line notes

    Detail - blank line for spacing

    Group footer 1 - hidden based on expression

    Group footer 1 - hidden based on expression ** One of these 2 lines will print based on the expression

    Group footer 1 - sub report for more notes

    Group footer 1 - Closing paragraph

    Group footer 1 - Signature area

    Group footer 1 - sub report for last page of terms / scope notes. NOTE: This sub report also contains a table and the table has a page break before so that I can get these on another page.

So, after # 8 above there is a page break. The remaining footers before # 14 easily fit on the rest of the page. The group 1 also has a page break at the end so it breaks between quotes. I have tried to insert a page break on the rectangle for # 13 and remove the page break on the sub report in # 14 but although everything fits it doesn't page break before the sub report.

It looks like it always page breaks after the last page in the sub report.

Any ideas on how to get around this?

Thanks in advance,

Sherry

Try this:
1.- In the sub report (on every List or Rectangle you have):
1.1.- Right click, Properties.
1.2.- uncheck "Insert a page break after this list".
1.3.- Click on "Edit details group"
1.4.- uncheck "Page break at end".|||

Thanks for the feedback. I had tried that and then it wouldn't page break.

I did resolve it although I feel the original way should have worked.

I created another Group 1 for the same grouping clause (Quote #). This pushed my original grouping to Group 2. I then put a page break after Group #2. I only had a group footer for Group # 1 with the sub report in it. I had to take the sub report page break before off.

Thanks again,

Sherry

Page break after a group ??

Hi all
In my report, a page break is getting addred for each group of records. Thus
if a group has only 3 lines of data , RS adds a page break and the next
grouping starts on a new page. Thereby making the report span in more pages
thatn expected.
I've checked the settings in the "edit group" window as well as on the table
properties but can not find anything that should cause these page breaks.
Any pointers are appreciated.
Thanks
KWould you verify that your RDL does not contain any PageBreakAtEnd tags.
What is the settings for the report and body heights?
--
Bruce Johnson [MSFT]
Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"k" <test@.msn.com> wrote in message
news:uluuhnghEHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi all
> In my report, a page break is getting addred for each group of records.
Thus
> if a group has only 3 lines of data , RS adds a page break and the next
> grouping starts on a new page. Thereby making the report span in more
pages
> thatn expected.
> I've checked the settings in the "edit group" window as well as on the
table
> properties but can not find anything that should cause these page breaks.
> Any pointers are appreciated.
> Thanks
> K
>|||here are my settings:
Report Height = 11"
Body height = 3.125"
The rdl conatined the "PageBreakAtend" tag in the first grouping tag. But
if I remove the tag completely, then at the end of the group, the page break
is not displayed but the Table header is displayed as if its a new page.
"Bruce Johnson [MSFT]" <brucejoh@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:#2hN$wghEHA.384@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Would you verify that your RDL does not contain any PageBreakAtEnd tags.
> What is the settings for the report and body heights?
> --
> Bruce Johnson [MSFT]
> Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
> "k" <test@.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:uluuhnghEHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > Hi all
> >
> > In my report, a page break is getting addred for each group of records.
> Thus
> > if a group has only 3 lines of data , RS adds a page break and the next
> > grouping starts on a new page. Thereby making the report span in more
> pages
> > thatn expected.
> >
> > I've checked the settings in the "edit group" window as well as on the
> table
> > properties but can not find anything that should cause these page
breaks.
> >
> > Any pointers are appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> > K
> >
> >
>|||I am not quite sure what you in your RDL.
From the sounds of description, you did not understand why you were getting
a page break at the end of your group. You seemed to have resolved that by
the discovery of the PageBreakAtEnd tag in the first (outermost) group.
Do you have RepeatOnNewPage set for the table header or group header rows?
If you do then you will get a them repeated when a new page occurs.
If you want you can post your RDL I will take a look at it.
--
Bruce Johnson [MSFT]
Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"k" <test@.msn.com> wrote in message
news:uyQYjQhhEHA.3476@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> here are my settings:
> Report Height = 11"
> Body height = 3.125"
> The rdl conatined the "PageBreakAtend" tag in the first grouping tag. But
> if I remove the tag completely, then at the end of the group, the page
break
> is not displayed but the Table header is displayed as if its a new page.
>
> "Bruce Johnson [MSFT]" <brucejoh@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:#2hN$wghEHA.384@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Would you verify that your RDL does not contain any PageBreakAtEnd tags.
> > What is the settings for the report and body heights?
> > --
> > Bruce Johnson [MSFT]
> > Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> >
> >
> > "k" <test@.msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:uluuhnghEHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > In my report, a page break is getting addred for each group of
records.
> > Thus
> > > if a group has only 3 lines of data , RS adds a page break and the
next
> > > grouping starts on a new page. Thereby making the report span in more
> > pages
> > > thatn expected.
> > >
> > > I've checked the settings in the "edit group" window as well as on the
> > table
> > > properties but can not find anything that should cause these page
> breaks.
> > >
> > > Any pointers are appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > K
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Page break

Hello,

I'm using SQL 2005 reporting services.

I habe table with two group.

Group A and Group B.

I set Page break at start and at end for each group in order each group will be in the new page.

it is not working and I'm getting group A and B in the same page

Do you have visibility properties set on the groups? If so, pagebreaks will be ignored.|||

I know this problem but no, I have no visibility set.

I currently change from table to list and it seemse to work fine but still..

I have group A header and footer and also for group B

My problem is that the first header from group A is in the same page with first header from Group B

Also last record in the Group B in the same page with the footer from group A.

Aslo I have a problem with document map. I create a document map from group A and group B and if the content is not in a differed pages the document map build successfuly but the link is not correct

page break

I have a matrix and I want to insert a page break on a column group. I dont
see the option under grouping and sorting properties for my column groups
only on the rows?On Nov 2, 10:39 am, RYF <R...@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I have a matrix and I want to insert a page break on a column group. I dont
> see the option under grouping and sorting properties for my column groups
> only on the rows?
Unfortunately, this functionality does not exist currently. A
workaround would be to create 2 matrices/matrix controls in the report
and have the columns you want on the odd pages in the first matrix
control (and do a page break after it) and the columns you want on the
even pages in the second matrix control (and do a page break after it
as well). Sorry that I could not be of greater assistance.
Regards,
Enrique Martinez
Sr. Software Consultant

Page brakes after top group item

I just started with reporting services.
I created report that has two groujping items in the table. Everything works
fine just I always get second row for the top level group on the second
page. This doesn't make any sense to me
1) I am using HTML rending and I don't need all this pages
2) the top group item has only one detailed item and second has about 8
items they all can fit on one page even if viewed in collapsed state
3) There are no any forced page breaks for any table items and for table
itself.
Any ideas how to solve the problem?
ShimonSorry
I just figure out that it looks like that only in preview but on the site it
looks fine.
Thanks,
Shimon.
"Shimon Sim" <estshim@.att.net> wrote in message
news:eeQ3XrQeEHA.2376@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I just started with reporting services.
> I created report that has two groujping items in the table. Everything
works
> fine just I always get second row for the top level group on the second
> page. This doesn't make any sense to me
> 1) I am using HTML rending and I don't need all this pages
> 2) the top group item has only one detailed item and second has about 8
> items they all can fit on one page even if viewed in collapsed state
> 3) There are no any forced page breaks for any table items and for table
> itself.
> Any ideas how to solve the problem?
> Shimon
>

Monday, March 26, 2012

Packages

Hello all,
Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
stored procs to do with the Employee table?
Thanks all,
Jon
Jon
No, It does not exist in SQL Server in this concept but it does exist in
concept of DTS packages to copy/modify data
"Jon" <Jon@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BABA5A45-72F5-45D2-8318-7396FB095C0B@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of
packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon
|||Unfortunately not (*). A database has a number of stored procedures. Period... :-)
But nothing stop you from having one procedure calling another or having a naming convention with
which you easier see some "grouping".
There actually is one way of grouping stored procedures, like below. Very rarely used, and my guess
is that this is on target list to be removed in the future.
CREATE PROC p;1 AS SELECT 1
CREATE PROC p;2 AS SELECT 2
EXEC p;1
EXEC p;2
DROP PROCEDURE p;1 --No can do
DROP PROCEDURE p --Drops all!!!
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Jon" <Jon@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BABA5A45-72F5-45D2-8318-7396FB095C0B@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon
|||Thanks guys.
"Jon" wrote:

> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon

Packages

Hello all,
Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
stored procs to do with the Employee table?
Thanks all,
JonJon
No, It does not exist in SQL Server in this concept but it does exist in
concept of DTS packages to copy/modify data
"Jon" <Jon@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BABA5A45-72F5-45D2-8318-7396FB095C0B@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of
packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon|||Unfortunately not (*). A database has a number of stored procedures. Period... :-)
But nothing stop you from having one procedure calling another or having a naming convention with
which you easier see some "grouping".
There actually is one way of grouping stored procedures, like below. Very rarely used, and my guess
is that this is on target list to be removed in the future.
CREATE PROC p;1 AS SELECT 1
CREATE PROC p;2 AS SELECT 2
EXEC p;1
EXEC p;2
DROP PROCEDURE p;1 --No can do
DROP PROCEDURE p --Drops all!!!
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Jon" <Jon@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BABA5A45-72F5-45D2-8318-7396FB095C0B@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon|||Thanks guys.
"Jon" wrote:
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon

Packages

Hello all,
Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of packages,
where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
stored procs to do with the Employee table?
Thanks all,
JonJon
No, It does not exist in SQL Server in this concept but it does exist in
concept of DTS packages to copy/modify data
"Jon" <Jon@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BABA5A45-72F5-45D2-8318-7396FB095C0B@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of
packages,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon|||Unfortunately not (*). A database has a number of stored procedures. Period.
. :-)
But nothing stop you from having one procedure calling another or having a n
aming convention with
which you easier see some "grouping".
There actually is one way of grouping stored procedures, like below. Very ra
rely used, and my guess
is that this is on target list to be removed in the future.
CREATE PROC p;1 AS SELECT 1
CREATE PROC p;2 AS SELECT 2
EXEC p;1
EXEC p;2
DROP PROCEDURE p;1 --No can do
DROP PROCEDURE p --Drops all!!!
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Jon" <Jon@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BABA5A45-72F5-45D2-8318-7396FB095C0B@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of package
s,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jon|||Thanks guys.
"Jon" wrote:

> Hello all,
> Apologies if this is in the wrong group.
> I'm only just starting to use SQL Server 2000 after using Oracle for a
> number of years. Can you tell me if Server 2000 has the concept of package
s,
> where I can package all associated stored procs togther. For example, all
> stored procs to do with the Employee table?
> Thanks all,
> Jonsql

Monday, February 20, 2012

Overlapping Permissions

I would think the following scenario should work, but it does not:
I have a table, Products, for which all users, via an NT domain group (e.g.
Domain Users) have only select permissions.
There is another group, ProductManagers, who are also members of the above
group, who need update, delete, and insert permissions. To accomplish this,
I
created a database role ProductMgmt, and added the ProductManagers to it.
This role has select, insert, update and delete permissions on the table.
The members of this group, however, get an error when attempting to delete
from the table. These members belong to both the Domain User and
ProductManagers groups.
I've also given the ProductManager group full permissions on the table. I'm
confused as to why all of this is not working, obviously I'm missing
something.
Thanks for any assistance,
TomtDoes the NT group which has only select permissions have a
deny on delete? Do any users or groups have deny set on the
table?
Permissions are cumulative but deny will take precedence.
-Sue
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:51:03 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
wrote:

>I would think the following scenario should work, but it does not:
>I have a table, Products, for which all users, via an NT domain group (e.g.
>Domain Users) have only select permissions.
>There is another group, ProductManagers, who are also members of the above
>group, who need update, delete, and insert permissions. To accomplish this,
I
>created a database role ProductMgmt, and added the ProductManagers to it.
>This role has select, insert, update and delete permissions on the table.
>The members of this group, however, get an error when attempting to delete
>from the table. These members belong to both the Domain User and
>ProductManagers groups.
>I've also given the ProductManager group full permissions on the table. I'm
>confused as to why all of this is not working, obviously I'm missing
>something.
>Thanks for any assistance,
>Tomt
>|||Sue,
Thanks for your reply. No, there are no deny's on delete. I did know that
one, but am missing something...
Thanks
Tom
"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:

> Does the NT group which has only select permissions have a
> deny on delete? Do any users or groups have deny set on the
> table?
> Permissions are cumulative but deny will take precedence.
> -Sue
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:51:03 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
> wrote:
>
>|||And there are no other Windows groups and no other roles in
that database? Just the two roles and the two NT groups?
And members of the ProductMgmt role can select, insert and
update but not delete?
-Sue
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:44:04 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Sue,
>Thanks for your reply. No, there are no deny's on delete. I did know that
>one, but am missing something...
>Thanks
>Tom
>"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:
>|||There's the Domain Users and two other non-NT, SQL Server accounts for web
access to the table.
There are no other roles other than the built-in roles. That group has
select, insert, update and delete permissions.
I'm going to have them try it again tomorrow, I might have overlooked
checking the delete permission, which is just due to trying to do too many
things at once...
I'll post the results tomorrow. Thanks for your assistance with this.
Tom
"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:

> And there are no other Windows groups and no other roles in
> that database? Just the two roles and the two NT groups?
> And members of the ProductMgmt role can select, insert and
> update but not delete?
> -Sue
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:44:04 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
> wrote:
>
>|||Tom
Grant them EXECUTE permission on SP that perform DELETE/INSERT/UPDATE on
this table.
"TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com> wrote in message
news:F6DB5A9A-6ADF-4F89-89E8-9656A8962BFF@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> There's the Domain Users and two other non-NT, SQL Server accounts for web
> access to the table.
> There are no other roles other than the built-in roles. That group has
> select, insert, update and delete permissions.
> I'm going to have them try it again tomorrow, I might have overlooked
> checking the delete permission, which is just due to trying to do too many
> things at once...
> I'll post the results tomorrow. Thanks for your assistance with this.
> Tom
> "Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:
>
that[vbcol=seagreen]
group (e.g.[vbcol=seagreen]
above[vbcol=seagreen]
accomplish this, I[vbcol=seagreen]
to it.[vbcol=seagreen]
table.[vbcol=seagreen]
delete[vbcol=seagreen]
table. I'm[vbcol=seagreen]|||You really should check the other permissions as well as it
could make it easier for you to determine what has been
missed. Check the select, insert and update permissions as
well.
-Sue
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:31:03 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>There's the Domain Users and two other non-NT, SQL Server accounts for web
>access to the table.
>There are no other roles other than the built-in roles. That group has
>select, insert, update and delete permissions.
>I'm going to have them try it again tomorrow, I might have overlooked
>checking the delete permission, which is just due to trying to do too many
>things at once...
>I'll post the results tomorrow. Thanks for your assistance with this.
>Tom
>"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:
>|||I checked them all, for that particular group, and still no go. I have to
grant the permissions for the Domain Users group for insert, delete, etc.
otherwise the group I really need to have this access does not.
To summarize: Two groups (NT) Domain Users, to which all users belong,
member of the public role, and ProductManagers, member of public and
ProductMgmt roles.
A user, Rod, belongs to both Domain Users and ProductManagers groups.
ProductMangers have select, insert, delete and update permissions on table;
Domain Users have Select permission only, no other permissions granted or
denied.
Database role ProductMgmt has full permissions on the table.
With the scenario above, Rod cannot delete from the table. I have to grant
delete permissions to Domain Users in order for him to be able to delete row
s
from the table.
I gather from your replies that this should work, and I have set it up
correctly, is that right?
Thanks,
Tom
"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:

> You really should check the other permissions as well as it
> could make it easier for you to determine what has been
> missed. Check the select, insert and update permissions as
> well.
> -Sue
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:31:03 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
> wrote:
>
>|||Yes it will work so you are still missing something. I can't
reproduce the issue rebuilding with the same groups and
roles - it works fine on my end.
Try using xp_logininfo to determine the group membership and
dsiplay information on the Product Managers group at the
Windows level.
-Sue
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:45:01 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>I checked them all, for that particular group, and still no go. I have to
>grant the permissions for the Domain Users group for insert, delete, etc.
>otherwise the group I really need to have this access does not.
>To summarize: Two groups (NT) Domain Users, to which all users belong,
>member of the public role, and ProductManagers, member of public and
>ProductMgmt roles.
>A user, Rod, belongs to both Domain Users and ProductManagers groups.
>ProductMangers have select, insert, delete and update permissions on table;
>Domain Users have Select permission only, no other permissions granted or
>denied.
>Database role ProductMgmt has full permissions on the table.
>With the scenario above, Rod cannot delete from the table. I have to grant
>delete permissions to Domain Users in order for him to be able to delete ro
ws
>from the table.
>I gather from your replies that this should work, and I have set it up
>correctly, is that right?
>Thanks,
>Tom
>"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:
>|||Sue,
I found the problem, the person who set up the NT user group
ProductManagers, set it up as a distribution group, not a security group.
Once that was fixed, everything works correctly.
BTW, I assume this would still work without the database role, i.e., just
the ProductManager group having the delete, etc. permissions assigned,
correct?
thanks for your help and patience,
Tom
"Sue Hoegemeier" wrote:

> Yes it will work so you are still missing something. I can't
> reproduce the issue rebuilding with the same groups and
> roles - it works fine on my end.
> Try using xp_logininfo to determine the group membership and
> dsiplay information on the Product Managers group at the
> Windows level.
> -Sue
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:45:01 -0800, "TomT" <tomt@.tomt.com>
> wrote:
>
>